Analisis kinerja keuangan pemerintah daerah Kabupaten Kepulauan Siau Tagulandang Biaro (SITARO)

Authors

  • Queenzy Victoria Londah Sam Ratulangi University
  • Jantje J. Tinangon Sam Ratulangi University
  • Peter M. Kapojos Sam Ratulangi University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58784/rapi.516

Keywords:

regional financial performance, financial ratio, fiscal decentralization, financial independence

Abstract

Fiscal decentralization is meant to strengthen local fiscal capacity, yet island regencies face high service costs and narrow revenue bases that keep them dependent on central transfers, a weakness that an unqualified audit opinion does not reveal. This study analyzes the financial performance of the Siau Tagulandang Biaro (SITARO) Islands Regency Government, Indonesia, for 2021–2025 and explains how island geography shapes it. A descriptive quantitative design was applied to five regional financial ratios (fiscal decentralization, financial independence, revenue effectiveness, financial efficiency, and expenditure harmony) computed from Budget Realization Reports (LRA) and interpreted against official criteria, with interviews of three officials of the regional financial management agency (BPKPD) used for triangulation. Fiscal decentralization (3.46%–5.01%) and financial independence (3.62%–5.35%) were consistently very low, indicating an instructive relationship pattern. Revenue effectiveness fluctuated, falling from 104.48% in 2021 to 67.30% in 2024 before recovering to 99.43% in 2025. Financial efficiency improved from 85.61% to 76.33%, while the operating expenditure share rose from 75.15% to 90.95% and the capital expenditure share fell from 24.44% to 8.63%. The study positions island geography as a contextual variable that jointly constrains revenue capacity and capital expenditure capacity, rather than treating fiscal dependence and expenditure composition as independent phenomena. Island regencies should adopt geography-sensitive own-source revenue strategies and realistic revenue targets while safeguarding capital expenditure space for infrastructure and inter-island connectivity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aithan, I., Frinaldi, A., Putri, N. E., & Asnil. (2025). Analisis kinerja keuangan daerah pemerintah Kabupaten Solok berdasarkan APBD tahun 2024. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Administrasi Modern, 9(2), 8–21. https://journal.fexaria.com/j/index.php/jeam/article/view/182

Akib, M., Nurdin, E., Fadliah, R., & Fitriyani. (2024). Analisis kinerja keuangan pemerintah daerah Kabupaten Buton Utara. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 9(1), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.33772/jakuho.v9i1.140

Amalia, H. R., & Pratiwi, B. Y. (2022). Analisis kinerja keuangan pemerintah daerah Kabupaten Banyuwangi tahun anggaran 2018–2020. Jurnal Akuntansi Terapan dan Bisnis, 2(1), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.25047/asersi.v2i1.3197

Bird, R. M., & Wallich, C. (1993). Fiscal decentralization and intergovernmental relations in transition economies: Toward a systematic framework of analysis (Policy Research Working Paper No. 1122). World Bank. https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/wbrwps/1122.html

Faradilla, S., & Hanifa, N. (2024). Analisis rasio efektivitas PAD, efisiensi PAD dan kemandirian Kota Surabaya. INDEPENDENT: Journal of Economics, 4(3), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.26740/independent.v4i3.65910

Gustami, K. P., Fransisco, S., Rachmawati, F. A., & Nur, B. F. (2024). Analisa kinerja keuangan pemerintah Kota Depok tahun 2019–2022. Jurnal Penelitian Ekonomi Manajemen dan Bisnis, 3(3), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.55606/jekombis.v3i3.3782

Halim, A. (2007). Akuntansi keuangan daerah. Salemba Empat.

Halim, A., & Kusufi, M. S. (2020). Akuntansi sektor publik: Akuntansi keuangan daerah. Salemba Empat.

Hapsari, M. T., Zamzama, D. A., Sujiatmiko, D. P. S., Umroh, R. U. Z., & Kusumadewi, R. T. (2025). Analisis rasio keuangan daerah dalam laporan realisasi anggaran. JIBEMA: Jurnal Ilmu Bisnis, Ekonomi, Manajemen, dan Akuntansi, 3(2), 154–164. https://doi.org/10.62421/jibema.v3i2.175

Julaeha, R. S., & Penangsang, P. (2024). Analisis rasio keuangan daerah untuk mengukur kinerja keuangan pemerintah Kabupaten Tuban tahun 2019–2023. Jurnal Nirta: Studi Inovasi, 4(1), 441–452. https://ejournal.nlc-education.or.id/index.php/JNSI/article/view/65

Mahmudi. (2019). Analisis laporan keuangan pemerintah daerah. UPP STIM YKPN.

Mardiasmo. (2021). Akuntansi sektor publik. Andi.

Menteri Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia. (1996). Keputusan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 690.900-327 tahun 1996 tentang pedoman penilaian dan kinerja keuangan. Kementerian Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia.

Republik Indonesia. (2003). Undang-Undang Nomor 17 tahun 2003 tentang Keuangan Negara. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2003 Nomor 47. Sekretariat Negara.

Republik Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Nomor 23 tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 244. Sekretariat Negara.

Sahdan, R., Hormati, A., & Irham, J. (2024). Analisis kinerja keuangan pemerintah daerah Kabupaten Kepulauan Sula. JIAKu: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 3(2), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.24034/jiaku.v3i2.6445

Wahyudi, U., Zahroh, V. A., & Novitasari, D. (2025). Fiscal performance and financial independence of Malang City Government (2020–2024): A qualitative assessment. PANGRIPTA, 8(2), 262–273. https://doi.org/10.58411/4erens08

Weygandt, J. J., Kimmel, P. D., & Kieso, D. E. (2021). Financial accounting (11th edition). John Wiley & Sons.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

Londah, Q. V., Tinangon, J. J., & Kapojos , P. M. (2026). Analisis kinerja keuangan pemerintah daerah Kabupaten Kepulauan Siau Tagulandang Biaro (SITARO). Riset Akuntansi Dan Portofolio Investasi, 4(2), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.58784/rapi.516

Issue

Section

Article